In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit Â鶹Éç Webwise for full instructions
What is the role of an early stage investor? I was reminded of that question when watching Letitia and Alex the young couple who made the Survivor Jak a replacement for the survival jacket who presented on the Den this evening.
I could easily understand if viewers wondered sometimes on what basis the Dragons make their decisions. Early on in her presentation Letitia made a remarkably uninformed comment: that more than half the British population were "walkers" by which she meant "hikers" or "ramblers".
But of course more than half the population are not the kind of walkers that might need a survival jacket and it was glaringly obvious to the dragons that she had completely missed the point.
Entrepreneur Doug was a Dragon from 2005 to 2007.
The mistake itself wasn't the issue for them. For Peter and Theo it was a signal that she didn't have the nous to be an entrepreneur.
They assumed, I suspect, that if she managed to make such a simple mistake as that, she would make other mistakes of equal issue in the future.
Doug on the programme
But was it a fatal error? After all, her product had some offsetting accomplishments. Unlike many products in the Den, this product was already being manufactured and it had already been ordered: what appeared to be a substantial distributor had ordered 10,000 units.
The value of an initial order should never, ever be underestimated. Almost all of the biggest risks of a new product circle around whether or not it will be accepted in the market at all, and, even if there is demand, what the path to the market will be. Many great products have died a silent death because they could not find a way to let the world know about it. A significant order by a reputable distributor sweeps those risks away.
Deborah, bless her soul, clearly saw this. She accepted the weakness of the team and the strength of their position and saw what I think more angel investors have to see: that it is impossible to make a bad product good but it is quite possible to coach and mentor young entrepreneurs to become great. I was heartened by her investment.
Last updated: 23rd August 2010. Follow Doug on Twitter
These are the views of Doug Richard, not those of the Â鶹Éç
Each week in the 2010 series Julie Meyer and Doug Richard offered their take on some of the key moments from the TV Den.
Week 1: Kirsty, the Best of Britain
Week 2: Called to account
Week 3: Where pitches go wrong
Week 4: A school for entrepreneurs
Week 5: Why evaluation matters
Week 6: When coup de foudre happens
Week 7: The role of an early investor
Week 8: What finishes a pitch
Week 9: Unlocking an investment
Week 10: Lessons from the Den
A glimpse behind the scenes with investment reactions.
Dom tests this week's products with the public.
Other entrepreneurs from this episode:
Missed any action? Catch up and find out more about the Online Dragons.
Â鶹Éç © 2014 The Â鶹Éç is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Comments
Thank goodness for some honest feedback. In this series it looks like the Dragons are only looking for 'no-brainers' where the majority of work has been done and all they need to do is provide their contacts for a guaranteed return. What has happened to their mentoring role? It was obvious that Letitia and Alex were not concerned about the money. It was the guidance to launch a great product. OK they made the mistake about 38m walkers, but they only forecast to sell 0.5% of that market - not an unreasonable target. Come on Dragons lessen your arrogance!
Complain about this comment
Thank the lord for Doug and even Deborah. They were young entrepreneurs and made some (large) mistakes in their assumptions and numbers but overall the product looked good and had potential and proven future sales. In the real world I know some Angels who would snap opportunities like this up and provide guidance and management for the youngsters. It seems to me (as proven with the wand) that all you need now is to give the dragons a 3 year plan, a decent speech and a track history of success and they'll invest. Disappointing as I think it's stifling creative business at the real acorn stage, which I thought this show was aimed at.
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS