麻豆社 in the news, Thursday
| 09:47 UK time, Thursday, 1 February 2007
Daily Telegraph: Reports that the iPlayer proposals have been approved by the 麻豆社 Trust for later this year. ()
The Guardian: Reports on Spectator by Lord Puttnam, who says he will not be applying for 麻豆社 chairmanship. ()
The Sun: Leader article criticises 麻豆社 bulletin鈥檚 coverage of Birmingham terror raids. ()
Comments
Classic piece of journalism from The Sun.
Who's side are these guys on?
Obviously impartial reporting is a skill absent from the newsrooms of this great paper!
Dan
Why should the 麻豆社 be impartial when we are talking about people who want to murder British soldiers? This is a big problem at the 麻豆社, they think they always have to be 'balanced' at all times, equal time for terrorists as to the police/security services. The 麻豆社 is the BRITISH Broadcasting Company. When people want to kill British citizens I want the 麻豆社 to show the same outrage as the rest of the population, not sit on the fence and give the potential murderers equal time to spout their propaganda.
Did The Sun get this right? They stated that the 麻豆社 report about the joint raid by the West Midlands Police and MI5 included the phrase: "... and, as we know, the intelligence services often get it wrong".
I doubt that 麻豆社 would have used 鈥渙ften鈥 as this would have surely been incorrect and even provocative.
Perhaps we need a third party news agency to report on 麻豆社 reports.
Well I just read the Sun's comment and I have to say that they have a point, it goes along with the 麻豆社's effective condoning of suicide attacks on innocent civillians in Israel with their last sentence which took my breath away and still does every time I read it.
In response to Dan,
If you think the 麻豆社 is anymore impartial than the Sun then I pity you.
The 麻豆社 has a blog running called Bias at the 麻豆社, you will note that of the 326 posts so far 323 think the 麻豆社 is biased towards left-wing groups, so 麻豆社 impartial?, I don't think so.