Interesting Stuff 2008-09-19
Post categories: round up
| 10:45 UK time, Friday, 19 September 2008
Â鶹Éç Radio Labs has been having fun this week Building Things For The Office. The result: "Dog Vader"!
Â鶹Éç Backstage has been in this month and also has of a new called CALLAS or...
"Conveying Affectiveness in Leading-edge Living Adaptive Systems"
And Backstage's Rain Ashford has, by her own admission, a (and ) from in Coventry:
time and again speakers mentioned how virtual worlds are on the cusp of major development and in a similar emerging state as the web was in the early 90s
Tech Radar at the IBC conference.
Finally, Dan Taylor asks an intriguing : "Is Â鶹Éç Weather really more popular than porn?"
Nick Reynolds is editor, Â鶹Éç Internet Blog.
Comment number 1.
At 19th Sep 2008, PicksyJ wrote:You know, you've provided links to everything you've talked about in that article. Almost.
You provided a link to Dan Taylor; to him asking the Â鶹Éç question, and to Â鶹Éç Weather. But you didn't link to the porn... come on, your viewers need to know -- what porn sites are endorsed by the Beeb?
:-)
(Just joshing chief; obviously I understand why that wasn't linked...)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 22nd Sep 2008, NickReynolds wrote:It's funny you mention that. I did think about a suitable image to illustrate the post.
But a search on flickr for "Â鶹Éç weather porn" turned up nothing...
Nick Reynolds (editor, Â鶹Éç Internet blog)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 13th Jun 2009, U14033173 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 8th Sep 2009, felicioo wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 13th Sep 2009, U14134634 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)