Â鶹Éç

Explore the Â鶹Éç
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

24 September 2014
Press Office
Search the Â鶹Éç and Web
Search Â鶹Éç Press Office

Â鶹Éç Homepage

Contact Us

Mark Thompson

Press Releases

Thompson expresses "real disappointment" at Licence Fee settlement but welcomes privilege of certain funding


The Â鶹Éç's Director-General today expressed "real disappointment" at the Government's final licence fee level settlement but said it was a privilege to receive and gave certainty in planning to create the best possible content and services for all audiences.

Ìý

Mark Thompson said no commercial rival enjoyed that certainty of funding.

Ìý

While the Â鶹Éç could argue the benefits extra funding would bring to the wider creative industries as well as audiences, he said it was ultimately for the Government to decide the level in the broader context of inflation and the wider public sector.

Ìý

He also welcomed the longer settlement at six years enabling efficient planning for digital switchover, rapidly changing audience expectations and new creative initiatives.

Ìý

"Our vision for the future, broadly endorsed by a Government White Paper, as well as their own requirements and ambitions, especially around digital switchover, plus not wanting existing, valued Â鶹Éç services to be squeezed as we invest for the future, led us to bid for a settlement that would increase in real terms.

Ìý

"The settlement announced today means the Â鶹Éç still receives substantial, guaranteed income of more than £20billion over the next six years, which is financial security denied to any other media player. But it leaves a gap of around £2bn over the next six years between what we believed we needed to deliver our vision and what will actually be available.

Ìý

"That's not a gap many organisations can swallow comfortably."

Ìý

Mr Thompson said there were three ways the organisation could now move to reduce the gap:

Ìý

1 - Simply not make some new investments, do them later or do them more modestly;

Ìý

2 - Increase self help targets. This would mean: increasing licence fee efficiencies in collection and evasion; maximising commercial revenues and continuing reform, modernisation and productivity;

Ìý

3 - Move resources inside the Â鶹Éç from existing content and services to new ideas.

Ìý

The Â鶹Éç's Executive Board and senior managers across the organisation would now review investment plans in the light of the settlement and explore the options.

Ìý

The Executive will then make initial recommendations to the Â鶹Éç Trust who will take decisions later in the year in the best interests of licence fee payers, drawing on the framework of the Â鶹Éç's public purposes and public value.

Ìý

Mr Thompson said: "The Â鶹Éç faces challenges to find enough money to create the fantastic content our audiences want.

Ìý

"After seven years of funding that has grown in real terms, we now face not just a tight settlement but daunting investment challenges in distribution, infrastructure and technology that risk diverting money away from content creation.

Ìý

"These challenges call for some new thinking about how we produce content and how we create value."

Ìý

Mr Thompson said that the Â鶹Éç's vision for content in the digital world, Creative Future, was never fundamentally about spending new money:

Ìý

"It is about flexing, adapting, liberating all content, but above all, content we already make. It's about unlocking the full value of existing investment."

Ìý

Notes to Editors

Ìý

The settlement

Ìý

The Â鶹Éç asked for: RPI + 1.8% and £600m to fund the targeted help scheme.

Ìý

The Government is giving the Â鶹Éç the equivalent of: RPI - 1.5% and £600m to fund the targeted help scheme.

Ìý

What does that mean in cash?

Ìý

Setting aside the costs of targeted help, digital switchover, Digital UK costs and the costs of Salford (which total around £1.2bn) we were hoping to be able to invest £2.8bn in our core and new programmes and services over the next six years.

Ìý

We now have only £400m - a gap of £2.4bn in real terms. Since the original bid we have identified a further £300m of self-help so the gap is £2.1bn. This gap could have been higher if we had not undertaken the VFM programme.

Ìý

Self help and efficiencies

Ìý

We're aiming to achieve net savings of 3.7% pa in our cost base between 2005-6 and 2012-13. Our existing VFM plans already mean cutting 3,800 posts and we're committed to annual savings of 2.7% thereafter.

Ìý

And this follows a long history of efficiency savings by the Â鶹Éç - by 2013 our average rate of efficiency savings over the last 20 years will have been around 4% pa.

Ìý

Household growth had already been taken that into account in our bid.

Ìý

Commercial businesses

Ìý

Our plans included an increase in commercial dividends of £300m over the period. Even PKF thought that target challenging.

Ìý

Licence fee collection and evasion

Ìý

We've already reduced collection and evasion cost significantly and were budgeting for a further £100m of savings over the period.

Ìý

Next steps

Ìý

The Executive are reviewing our priorities and will make recommendations to the Trust. As with everything we do, we'll be focussing on maximising public value.

Ìý

Â鶹Éç Press Office

Ìý

PRESS RELEASES BY DATE :



PRESS RELEASES BY:

FOLLOW

Category: Â鶹Éç
Date: 18.01.2007
Printable version
top^


The Â鶹Éç is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



About the Â鶹Éç | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy
Ìý