Remember Bevanite Ellie?
If anything illustrates the acceleration of the news cycle in the digital age it's the tale of . Just 24 hours ago Ellie Gellard was an obscure 20-year-old Labour-supporting student, blogger and tweeter (under that @bevaniteellie soubriquet), albeit one who tweeted so frequently that you feared for her thumbs.
Then she suddenly went quiet for 12 hours - to emerge on the platform as the warm-up act at Labour's manifesto launch. Immediately the blogosphere swung into action, combing through her past online activity in the hope of finding something even vaguely disreputable or embarrassing.
At first it seemed there was little of note, then a Tory blogger struck gold in the form of something written in 2008 by the Stilettoed Socialist as she dubbed herself at that time. The woman who at 20 thought Gordon Brown was the man to lead Britain into a brighter future saw things rather differently at 18, calling on the prime minister to depart the stage for the sake of the party.
Cue predictable Twitter-hurricane, with Tory tweeters rushing to press home their narrative of a spoilt and silly socialist socialite and Labour spinners hitting back with accusations of sexism, ageism and general meanness.
By mid-afternoon online versions of newspapers were carrying stories about Ellie - and a new frenzy of blame and counter-blame was unleashed.
We had the faintly ridiculous spectacle of Labour tweeters attacking a female journalist for writing disparagingly if accurately about a member of her own sex and the even more ridiculous spectacle of other journalists attacking the attackers for daring to be mean to their fellow scribe. In the words of the prophet Michael Winner: "Calm down, dears."
By this morning, when I found @bevaniteellie on the front pages of several newspapers, it already felt like very old news. And did it all matter, had some great issue of political significance been at stake here? No, but it had all been a bit more fun than working out what anybody is really going to do about the deficit.
Labour was proud of its innovative use of technology yesterday, with a shareable cartoon and a manifesto that was designed to be downloaded rather than bought from a newsagent - though the effect was slightly marred by a confusion between megabits and megabytes in the passage about broadband.
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit µþµþ°äÌý°Â±ð²ú·É¾±²õ±ð for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.
But I think the Conservatives will have learned something from Labour's launch. Don't expect to see Dizzy Thinks, Tory Bear or even Tim Montgomerie of ConservativeHome climbing onto the platform to big up David Cameron before he unveils his manifesto.
Comment number 1.
At 13th Apr 2010, baudolino wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 13th Apr 2010, calmandhope wrote:To be honest its storys like this that make me glad I avoid twitter like the plague. Although on the other hand she is extremely cute by the look of her...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 13th Apr 2010, Rich wrote:To be honest, I'm a bit surprised that Labour didn't do more checking before thrusting her into the limelight. She may be staunchly pro-Labour, but she seems quite out of touch. The best example for me (an ex-pat living in France) is how she perceives healthcare in France:
"the one thing that the have-nots [...] lack there is a safety net. A cast iron guarantee that if they are sick, treatment awaits. Free of charge."
That is simply not true, but it is an easy mistake to make if you do not know the French system. Someone with a bit more knowledge of 'abroad' would know not to risk making these kinds of inaccurate statements, and the Labour party should know better than to rely on an inexperienced but overenthusiastic Bevanite to head its manifesto launch.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 13th Apr 2010, richardblogger wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 13th Apr 2010, Ashley Hinton wrote:When the various parties start caring more about the voters than they do twitter/facebook/a.n.other.blog they might start to look a bit more electable than they are now.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 13th Apr 2010, Solomon Grundy wrote:Solomon blogs on Ellie:
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 13th Apr 2010, E6BadBoy wrote:Can hear the sound on the clip because I'm at work but it seems to be massively dumbing down and condescending to anyone who gives half a toss about this election.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 13th Apr 2010, E6BadBoy wrote:Sorry, meant to write 'Can't hear the sound...'
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 13th Apr 2010, PhilT wrote:So a 20 year old student is a Labour supporter.
In other news :-
Pope admists to Catholicism.
Bear photographed taking a crap in the woods.
She'll get over it, if and when she enters the real world.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 13th Apr 2010, Steve_M-H wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 13th Apr 2010, Chris wrote:The Â鶹Éç are totally and utterly OBSESSED by Twitter. Please stop. Does the Â鶹Éç have shares in Twitter?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 13th Apr 2010, Alister wrote:Did you see the cartoon's placard "ban the periodic table" - if it hadn't been for a personality clash Mendelev would have had the Noble prize in either 1906 or 1907. typical anti-science/anti-intelligence from labour
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 3rd Oct 2010, Gaz wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)